Graphic detail | No longer a tastemaker

The Oscars’ influence has waned

Modern Best Picture winners receive fewer references in subsequent films than their predecessors did

|2 min read
Listen to this story

“GREEN BOOK”? Critics sneered when Academy Award voters named this saccharine tale of a friendship between a black pianist and his white, tough-guy chauffeur the Best Picture of 2018. Yet rather than being a rare injustice, the award reinforced a trend. The top Oscar has increasingly gone to films that are soon forgotten.

A film’s quality is in the eye of the beholder. Its influence, however, can be measured more objectively. IMDb, a crowdsourced online database, contains a list of references to every film in subsequent films and TV shows. For example, “Casablanca” has over 1,600 references, including a discussion in “When Harry Met Sally” and a poster in “True Romance”.

The data are spotty: films from the 1980s get four times as many references as those from the 1940s. However, the same bias presumably applies to all films made in a given year. So a rough proxy for a movie’s cultural influence is to count how many times it was referred to in subsequent years, and then compare its tally with those of all other films made in the same year.

Decades ago, Best Picture nominees were regularly among the most influential films. Fully 68% of references to films made in 1939 are to “Gone with the Wind” (a winner) and “The Wizard of Oz” (nominated). A statistical model shows that in the 1950s, Best Picture winners had a 20% chance of being the most-referred-to film.

That changed with the advent of “Star Wars”, summer blockbusters and sequels. Since the 1970s the films most referred to have been commercial flicks. Oscar voters usually spurn such movies; the ones they do like have become commercially less successful, and thus less culturally relevant. Best Picture winners today have just a 2% chance of leading the references table. By snubbing “Black Panther” (which already has 151 references) and the art film “Roma”, this year’s voters scoffed at both cultural influence and critical acclaim.

Sources: IMDB; The Economist. Get the data

This article appeared in the Graphic detail section of the print edition under the headline “No longer a tastemaker”

Modi’s dangerous moment

From the March 2nd 2019 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition
off-the-charts
Subscriber only | Off the Charts

Taking you behind the scenes of our data journalism

Directly to your inbox every week

Labour faces a drubbing in England’s local elections

The party could lose more than half of the council seats it is defending

The war in Iran has sent American inflation sharply higher

Our predictive index has reached a sizzling 3.6%


Why eldest siblings are brainier

A new study finds that sickness may play a role


Even Hungary’s skewed elections might not save Viktor Orban

The ruling party is playing dirty. But our analysis shows the liberal opposition has a real chance of winning

Global democracy is in better shape than you think

EIU’s annual index suggests an end to the democracy recession

Donald Trump’s approval rating has sunk to Joe Biden’s lowest point

He is mirroring his predecessor’s post-debate slump of 2024